<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 1105 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751924</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the civil appeal was condoned after hearing the parties, with no further conditions or reasons recorded. The Supreme Court then declined to exercise its discretionary appellate jurisdiction, stating that it was not inclined to interfere in the matter, and dismissed the civil appeal. Any pending applications were disposed of with the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2024 14:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751391" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 1105 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751924</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the civil appeal was condoned after hearing the parties, with no further conditions or reasons recorded. The Supreme Court then declined to exercise its discretionary appellate jurisdiction, stating that it was not inclined to interfere in the matter, and dismissed the civil appeal. Any pending applications were disposed of with the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751924</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>