<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 1090 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751909</link>
    <description>Duty demand on rough marble slab clearances was found unsustainable because the assessee applied the tariff-prescribed conversion option under Chapter Note 5, while the department relied only on invoice details and a presumed formula error without comparative working or supporting evidence. The extended period of limitation was also held unavailable, as records were on file and returns were filed on self-assessment; mere audit detection of short payment, without proof of suppression, fraud, collusion, or wilful intent to evade duty, could not justify extended limitation. The demand was therefore barred on both merits and limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 09:16:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751376" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 1090 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751909</link>
      <description>Duty demand on rough marble slab clearances was found unsustainable because the assessee applied the tariff-prescribed conversion option under Chapter Note 5, while the department relied only on invoice details and a presumed formula error without comparative working or supporting evidence. The extended period of limitation was also held unavailable, as records were on file and returns were filed on self-assessment; mere audit detection of short payment, without proof of suppression, fraud, collusion, or wilful intent to evade duty, could not justify extended limitation. The demand was therefore barred on both merits and limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751909</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>