https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751904 The Supreme Court's EVM-VVPAT ruling rejected a challenge based on suspicion or apprehension alone and declined to require a return to paper ballots or 100% counting of VVPAT slips. It held that the election framework, including Form 17A, Form 17C, random VVPAT verification, recount procedures on discrepancy, and the complaint mechanism under Rule 49MA, sufficiently protects the voter's right to know that the vote is recorded and counted. The Court also stated that voters have a right to momentary viewing of the VVPAT slip, not physical custody of it. Limited forward-looking safeguards were directed to strengthen transparency without disturbing the electoral process. en-us Fri, 26 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Apr 2024 15:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751904 The Supreme Court's EVM-VVPAT ruling rejected a challenge based on suspicion or apprehension alone and declined to require a return to paper ballots or 100% counting of VVPAT slips. It held that the election framework, including Form 17A, Form 17C, random VVPAT verification, recount procedures on discrepancy, and the complaint mechanism under Rule 49MA, sufficiently protects the voter's right to know that the vote is recorded and counted. The Court also stated that voters have a right to momentary viewing of the VVPAT slip, not physical custody of it. Limited forward-looking safeguards were directed to strengthen transparency without disturbing the electoral process. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 26 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751904