https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751903 The appellate court allowed the substitution of the respondent as the appellant/plaintiff after the original plaintiff's death, affirming that the right to an injunction survives to legal representatives. The court dismissed the petitioners' revision petition, permitting the respondent's son to apply for impleadment. The court emphasized that disinheritance and Will validity would be determined during trial proceedings, and the previous abatement ruling by the Delhi court did not preclude reevaluation. The judgment underscores the principle that the cause of action in an injunction suit can survive to legal heirs, contingent on possession and the merits of related disputes. en-us Sat, 20 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Apr 2024 09:16:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751903 The appellate court allowed the substitution of the respondent as the appellant/plaintiff after the original plaintiff's death, affirming that the right to an injunction survives to legal representatives. The court dismissed the petitioners' revision petition, permitting the respondent's son to apply for impleadment. The court emphasized that disinheritance and Will validity would be determined during trial proceedings, and the previous abatement ruling by the Delhi court did not preclude reevaluation. The judgment underscores the principle that the cause of action in an injunction suit can survive to legal heirs, contingent on possession and the merits of related disputes. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sat, 20 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751903