<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 735 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313700</link>
    <description>The SC reviewed the HC&#039;s orders in a contempt case involving the State Administrative Tribunal&#039;s alleged non-compliance with HC directions. While the SC justified the initiation of contempt proceedings, it found certain critical remarks by the HC unnecessary. The SC emphasized judicial decorum and maturity, accepted the Tribunal members&#039; unconditional apology, and allowed the appeal, expunging all critical remarks made by the HC.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2024 19:07:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751364" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 735 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313700</link>
      <description>The SC reviewed the HC&#039;s orders in a contempt case involving the State Administrative Tribunal&#039;s alleged non-compliance with HC directions. While the SC justified the initiation of contempt proceedings, it found certain critical remarks by the HC unnecessary. The SC emphasized judicial decorum and maturity, accepted the Tribunal members&#039; unconditional apology, and allowed the appeal, expunging all critical remarks made by the HC.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>