https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313697 The SC concluded that several stakeholders, including Dr. S.L. Adile and Selection Committee members, manipulated the admission process, favoring less meritorious candidates. Dr. Adile's apology was deemed insincere, resulting in a Rs. 2,000 fine. Other committee members were fined similarly for collusion. Mr. Keshav Desiraju and Dr. Jagdish Prasad received warnings for inadequate supervision. The Court underscored adherence to judicial orders and imposed penalties to uphold legal integrity. en-us Thu, 13 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Apr 2024 19:00:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313697 The SC concluded that several stakeholders, including Dr. S.L. Adile and Selection Committee members, manipulated the admission process, favoring less meritorious candidates. Dr. Adile's apology was deemed insincere, resulting in a Rs. 2,000 fine. Other committee members were fined similarly for collusion. Mr. Keshav Desiraju and Dr. Jagdish Prasad received warnings for inadequate supervision. The Court underscored adherence to judicial orders and imposed penalties to uphold legal integrity. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 13 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313697