<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 1437 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313691</link>
    <description>The SC granted permission to file SLPs, allowing appeals to proceed. It reiterated its previous order for the HC to expedite appeals by 31 March 2022, clarifying that prior contempt jurisdiction observations are non-binding. The APL Committee may seek necessary reliefs. SLPs and pending applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2024 18:06:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751350" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 1437 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313691</link>
      <description>The SC granted permission to file SLPs, allowing appeals to proceed. It reiterated its previous order for the HC to expedite appeals by 31 March 2022, clarifying that prior contempt jurisdiction observations are non-binding. The APL Committee may seek necessary reliefs. SLPs and pending applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313691</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>