<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (7) TMI 90 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36589</link>
    <description>The High Court of Allahabad ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that penalties under section 273(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 do not apply to assessments made under section 147(a) read with section 143(3). The Court interpreted &quot;regular assessment&quot; in section 273(b) to exclude assessments under section 147(a), emphasizing the need for statutory amendments to address any legislative gaps. The decision aligned with precedents from other High Courts and awarded costs and counsel fees to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:47:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75135" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (7) TMI 90 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36589</link>
      <description>The High Court of Allahabad ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that penalties under section 273(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 do not apply to assessments made under section 147(a) read with section 143(3). The Court interpreted &quot;regular assessment&quot; in section 273(b) to exclude assessments under section 147(a), emphasizing the need for statutory amendments to address any legislative gaps. The decision aligned with precedents from other High Courts and awarded costs and counsel fees to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36589</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>