https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313690 Special Leave Petition was not entertained because the main appeals remained pending before the Calcutta High Court. The Court requested the High Court to take up those appeals expeditiously and conclude them by 31 March 2022. It also clarified that, while deciding the appeals, the High Court should not treat observations made in the course of considering contempt jurisdiction as binding. All pending applications were disposed of. en-us Mon, 12 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Apr 2024 18:06:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313690 Special Leave Petition was not entertained because the main appeals remained pending before the Calcutta High Court. The Court requested the High Court to take up those appeals expeditiously and conclude them by 31 March 2022. It also clarified that, while deciding the appeals, the High Court should not treat observations made in the course of considering contempt jurisdiction as binding. All pending applications were disposed of. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 12 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313690