https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313688 The HC struck down three State land acquisition Acts that had become void when the Central Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 received Presidential assent on 27.09.2013. The court held that under Article 254, the State enactments became repugnant to the Central Act and could not be revived merely by inserting Section 105-A into the Central Act. The court ruled that revival required re-enactment under Article 254(2). Additionally, Section 105-A(2) mandating State Government notification within one year was not complied with, making the provision inoperative. The petition was allowed. en-us Wed, 03 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Apr 2024 18:06:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313688 The HC struck down three State land acquisition Acts that had become void when the Central Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 received Presidential assent on 27.09.2013. The court held that under Article 254, the State enactments became repugnant to the Central Act and could not be revived merely by inserting Section 105-A into the Central Act. The court ruled that revival required re-enactment under Article 254(2). Additionally, Section 105-A(2) mandating State Government notification within one year was not complied with, making the provision inoperative. The petition was allowed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 03 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313688