<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1823 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313687</link>
    <description>Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act permits re-determination of compensation where a court award grants higher compensation than the Collector&#039;s award. A Lok Adalat award is deemed to be a civil court decree under Section 21 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, and is final and binding; its status is reinforced by the Lok Adalat&#039;s civil court powers under Section 22. On that footing, a Lok Adalat award in a reference case can serve as the for a Section 28A claim, provided it is made within time. The claim for re-determination was therefore maintainable, and the rejection orders were unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2024 18:06:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751346" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1823 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313687</link>
      <description>Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act permits re-determination of compensation where a court award grants higher compensation than the Collector&#039;s award. A Lok Adalat award is deemed to be a civil court decree under Section 21 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, and is final and binding; its status is reinforced by the Lok Adalat&#039;s civil court powers under Section 22. On that footing, a Lok Adalat award in a reference case can serve as the for a Section 28A claim, provided it is made within time. The claim for re-determination was therefore maintainable, and the rejection orders were unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313687</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>