<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 1580 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313685</link>
    <description>The NCLAT dismissed appeals challenging the appellant&#039;s ineligibility as a resolution applicant under Section 29A(f) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The appellant was debarred by BSE from accessing securities markets for 10 years due to non-compliance with SEBI circulars dated 10.10.2016 and 01.08.2017. The tribunal rejected arguments that SEBI violated natural justice principles and Section 11(4) of the SEBI Act, 1992, holding that SEBI&#039;s action under Section 11(1) was valid and that BSE merely communicated the debarment information. The appellant&#039;s admission of being barred from securities markets confirmed their ineligibility under the Code.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2024 18:06:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751344" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 1580 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313685</link>
      <description>The NCLAT dismissed appeals challenging the appellant&#039;s ineligibility as a resolution applicant under Section 29A(f) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The appellant was debarred by BSE from accessing securities markets for 10 years due to non-compliance with SEBI circulars dated 10.10.2016 and 01.08.2017. The tribunal rejected arguments that SEBI violated natural justice principles and Section 11(4) of the SEBI Act, 1992, holding that SEBI&#039;s action under Section 11(1) was valid and that BSE merely communicated the debarment information. The appellant&#039;s admission of being barred from securities markets confirmed their ineligibility under the Code.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313685</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>