https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313681 The appellate court dismissed the appeal, affirming the trial court's judgment and decree. Compensation was awarded based on the Executive Engineer's report, valuing the land at Rs. 79,110 per acre, rather than the Land Acquisition Officer's suppressed valuation. The court confirmed the applicability of amended provisions of the Land Acquisition Act to the M.I.D.C. Act, including interest and solatium entitlements. The court emphasized the unjustified suppression of the Executive Engineer's report and upheld the trial court's decision to apply higher interest rates under the Land Acquisition Act, distinguishing it from provisions under the M.I.D.C. Act. en-us Thu, 28 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Apr 2024 16:27:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313681 The appellate court dismissed the appeal, affirming the trial court's judgment and decree. Compensation was awarded based on the Executive Engineer's report, valuing the land at Rs. 79,110 per acre, rather than the Land Acquisition Officer's suppressed valuation. The court confirmed the applicability of amended provisions of the Land Acquisition Act to the M.I.D.C. Act, including interest and solatium entitlements. The court emphasized the unjustified suppression of the Executive Engineer's report and upheld the trial court's decision to apply higher interest rates under the Land Acquisition Act, distinguishing it from provisions under the M.I.D.C. Act. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 28 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313681