<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (11) TMI 491 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313681</link>
    <description>Quarry land valuation could not be fixed by comparable agricultural sale instances because the acquired land was not agricultural and its nature and potential had to be assessed against similarly situated quarry lands. The compensation provisions of the Land Acquisition Act were treated as adopted by reference in section 33(5) of the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, so later amendments to those provisions continued to apply to acquisitions under that Act. Section 38, dealing with pre-award interest for non-payment, did not exclude the power to award interest on enhanced compensation under section 28 in reference proceedings. The enhanced compensation and interest were therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2024 16:27:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751339" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (11) TMI 491 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313681</link>
      <description>Quarry land valuation could not be fixed by comparable agricultural sale instances because the acquired land was not agricultural and its nature and potential had to be assessed against similarly situated quarry lands. The compensation provisions of the Land Acquisition Act were treated as adopted by reference in section 33(5) of the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, so later amendments to those provisions continued to apply to acquisitions under that Act. Section 38, dealing with pre-award interest for non-payment, did not exclude the power to award interest on enhanced compensation under section 28 in reference proceedings. The enhanced compensation and interest were therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313681</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>