https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313680 An establishment is treated as carried on by or under the authority of the Central Government only when that authority is legally conferred or arises from a true principal-agent or delegated relationship; mere funding, nomination power, business-rule allocation, or supervisory control is insufficient. Applying that test, the Court found the society functioned as a separate body with its own Governing Council and independent day-to-day administration, so the State Government remained the appropriate government. As a result, the MRTU and PULP Act applied, and the cancellation and substitution applications concerning the recognised union were maintainable under Sections 13 and 14; the Industrial Court's merits decision was restored. en-us Mon, 09 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Apr 2024 15:37:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313680 An establishment is treated as carried on by or under the authority of the Central Government only when that authority is legally conferred or arises from a true principal-agent or delegated relationship; mere funding, nomination power, business-rule allocation, or supervisory control is insufficient. Applying that test, the Court found the society functioned as a separate body with its own Governing Council and independent day-to-day administration, so the State Government remained the appropriate government. As a result, the MRTU and PULP Act applied, and the cancellation and substitution applications concerning the recognised union were maintainable under Sections 13 and 14; the Industrial Court's merits decision was restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 09 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313680