<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 830 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313679</link>
    <description>The HC directed the propounder to maintain the status quo concerning the deceased&#039;s estate, including shares and properties, pending probate proceedings. The applications for interlocutory reliefs were deemed necessary to protect the estate, but the appointment of an administrator pendente lite was not warranted at this stage. Parties were instructed to file affidavits within four weeks, with the matter set for review in eight weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2024 15:23:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751337" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 830 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313679</link>
      <description>The HC directed the propounder to maintain the status quo concerning the deceased&#039;s estate, including shares and properties, pending probate proceedings. The applications for interlocutory reliefs were deemed necessary to protect the estate, but the appointment of an administrator pendente lite was not warranted at this stage. Parties were instructed to file affidavits within four weeks, with the matter set for review in eight weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313679</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>