<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1840 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313675</link>
    <description>The SC determined that the permanent Lok Adalat exceeded its jurisdiction by adjudicating a dispute on merits, which it is not authorized to do. Consequently, the orders of the Lok Adalat and the HC were set aside. The Appellant-Corporation was directed to release Rs. 1 lakh to the Respondent within eight weeks, with the Court noting that this relief is case-specific and not a precedent. The appeal was allowed without costs, underscoring the necessity for Lok Adalats to operate within their jurisdictional boundaries.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2024 12:06:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751331" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1840 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313675</link>
      <description>The SC determined that the permanent Lok Adalat exceeded its jurisdiction by adjudicating a dispute on merits, which it is not authorized to do. Consequently, the orders of the Lok Adalat and the HC were set aside. The Appellant-Corporation was directed to release Rs. 1 lakh to the Respondent within eight weeks, with the Court noting that this relief is case-specific and not a precedent. The appeal was allowed without costs, underscoring the necessity for Lok Adalats to operate within their jurisdictional boundaries.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313675</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>