<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 1078 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751897</link>
    <description>SC addressed GST liability challenge on seigniorage fee. Court referred to prior Division Bench judgment, directing petitioners to submit objections within four weeks. Recovery of GST on royalty was halted pending Nine Judge Constitution Bench decision. Petitioners granted right to raise contentions in future proceedings. Petitions disposed of without costs, allowing reply submission within specified timeframe.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 10:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751319" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 1078 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751897</link>
      <description>SC addressed GST liability challenge on seigniorage fee. Court referred to prior Division Bench judgment, directing petitioners to submit objections within four weeks. Recovery of GST on royalty was halted pending Nine Judge Constitution Bench decision. Petitioners granted right to raise contentions in future proceedings. Petitions disposed of without costs, allowing reply submission within specified timeframe.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751897</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>