<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 1064 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751883</link>
    <description>Belated claims in CIRP cannot be reopened after the prescribed filing timeline and approval of the resolution plan, because insolvency resolution is time-bound and must preserve the fresh-slate basis of the plan. The COVID extension did not help where the limitation period had already expired before 15.03.2020, and the approved commercial framework could not be displaced. The claimed status as a homebuyer or financial creditor also failed because the receipt, allotment and buy-back documents were unreliable, the alleged payment was not reflected in the corporate records, and no independent proof of disbursal was produced. The challenge to rejection of the claim therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2024 09:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751291" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 1064 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751883</link>
      <description>Belated claims in CIRP cannot be reopened after the prescribed filing timeline and approval of the resolution plan, because insolvency resolution is time-bound and must preserve the fresh-slate basis of the plan. The COVID extension did not help where the limitation period had already expired before 15.03.2020, and the approved commercial framework could not be displaced. The claimed status as a homebuyer or financial creditor also failed because the receipt, allotment and buy-back documents were unreliable, the alleged payment was not reflected in the corporate records, and no independent proof of disbursal was produced. The challenge to rejection of the claim therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>