<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 1064 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751883</link>
    <description>The NCLAT dismissed an appeal challenging rejection of a belated claim filed 540 days after the deadline under Section 15 of IBC. The appellant sought admission as a financial creditor after the Committee of Creditors had already approved the resolution plan. The tribunal held that claims filed post-resolution plan approval cannot be entertained, emphasizing IBC&#039;s time-bound nature. The appellant failed to prove genuine homebuyer status, filing Form-C instead of Form-CA, with inconsistent unit numbers in documents and no credible evidence of Rs. 50 lakh payment to the corporate debtor. COVID-19 limitation extensions were inapplicable as the deadline expired before March 2020. The adjudicating authority&#039;s rejection was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2024 09:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751291" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 1064 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751883</link>
      <description>The NCLAT dismissed an appeal challenging rejection of a belated claim filed 540 days after the deadline under Section 15 of IBC. The appellant sought admission as a financial creditor after the Committee of Creditors had already approved the resolution plan. The tribunal held that claims filed post-resolution plan approval cannot be entertained, emphasizing IBC&#039;s time-bound nature. The appellant failed to prove genuine homebuyer status, filing Form-C instead of Form-CA, with inconsistent unit numbers in documents and no credible evidence of Rs. 50 lakh payment to the corporate debtor. COVID-19 limitation extensions were inapplicable as the deadline expired before March 2020. The adjudicating authority&#039;s rejection was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>