<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (5) TMI 7 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36583</link>
    <description>A wakf-alal-aulad is valid where the ultimate benefit is reserved for religious, pious or charitable purposes recognised by Muslim law, and a reserved power to alter beneficiaries or their shares does not by itself make the dedication void for uncertainty or a sham transaction; on the facts noted, the wakf had also been acted upon through enrolment, mutation, rent collection, tax and utility payments, and litigation in its name. A civil suit challenging a certificate proceeding is barred where questions about making, execution, discharge or satisfaction of the certificate must be decided by the Certificate Officer, and the statutory exception for fraud is neither pleaded nor established; the suit is therefore not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:33:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75129" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (5) TMI 7 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36583</link>
      <description>A wakf-alal-aulad is valid where the ultimate benefit is reserved for religious, pious or charitable purposes recognised by Muslim law, and a reserved power to alter beneficiaries or their shares does not by itself make the dedication void for uncertainty or a sham transaction; on the facts noted, the wakf had also been acted upon through enrolment, mutation, rent collection, tax and utility payments, and litigation in its name. A civil suit challenging a certificate proceeding is barred where questions about making, execution, discharge or satisfaction of the certificate must be decided by the Certificate Officer, and the statutory exception for fraud is neither pleaded nor established; the suit is therefore not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36583</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>