https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313666 The Bombay HC allowed a petition challenging a Lok Adalat award where third parties were excluded from litigation concerning property in Survey No. 104, Vadjai area. The court found that the same property was subject matter of both a 2000 partition suit (3 Acres 35 Gunthas) and a 2017 suit (7 Acres 19 Gunthas) from which petitioners were excluded. Relying on SC precedents, the court held that third parties qualify as "aggrieved persons" and can challenge Lok Adalat awards on grounds of fraud and misrepresentation when prima facie established. The Lok Adalat award was quashed and set aside. en-us Thu, 28 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 27 Apr 2024 15:10:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313666 The Bombay HC allowed a petition challenging a Lok Adalat award where third parties were excluded from litigation concerning property in Survey No. 104, Vadjai area. The court found that the same property was subject matter of both a 2000 partition suit (3 Acres 35 Gunthas) and a 2017 suit (7 Acres 19 Gunthas) from which petitioners were excluded. Relying on SC precedents, the court held that third parties qualify as "aggrieved persons" and can challenge Lok Adalat awards on grounds of fraud and misrepresentation when prima facie established. The Lok Adalat award was quashed and set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 28 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313666