https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313665 In a suit for specific performance, co-owners or heirs asserting a real interest in the suit property may be impleaded as defendants under Order I, Rule 10(2) CPC if their presence is needed for complete adjudication. Section 19 of the Specific Relief Act does not create an absolute bar to such impleadment; it only identifies against whom specific performance may be enforced. A stranger with no semblance of title is ordinarily not a proper party, but where the applicant shows a bona fide co-ownership claim and addition will not convert the suit into a title dispute, the Court may permit impleadment on terms confining the issues to specific performance. The impugned refusal to implead was therefore set aside. en-us Tue, 03 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 27 Apr 2024 15:10:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313665 In a suit for specific performance, co-owners or heirs asserting a real interest in the suit property may be impleaded as defendants under Order I, Rule 10(2) CPC if their presence is needed for complete adjudication. Section 19 of the Specific Relief Act does not create an absolute bar to such impleadment; it only identifies against whom specific performance may be enforced. A stranger with no semblance of title is ordinarily not a proper party, but where the applicant shows a bona fide co-ownership claim and addition will not convert the suit into a title dispute, the Court may permit impleadment on terms confining the issues to specific performance. The impugned refusal to implead was therefore set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 03 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313665