https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313661 The appeal was allowed, and the matter was remitted to the P&H HC for a fresh hearing. The HC must reconsider the writ petition concerning the appointment of an arbitrator under Section 8(i)(b) of the Requisition and Acquisition of Immovable Properties Act, 1952, considering relevant legal principles and precedents, including the Munsha case. The HC is directed to dispose of the matter within four months, with no opinion expressed on the merits of the case. The Lok Adalat's order for arbitrator appointment was deemed invalid due to the lack of a compromise or settlement. No costs were awarded. en-us Fri, 09 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 27 Apr 2024 12:52:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313661 The appeal was allowed, and the matter was remitted to the P&H HC for a fresh hearing. The HC must reconsider the writ petition concerning the appointment of an arbitrator under Section 8(i)(b) of the Requisition and Acquisition of Immovable Properties Act, 1952, considering relevant legal principles and precedents, including the Munsha case. The HC is directed to dispose of the matter within four months, with no opinion expressed on the merits of the case. The Lok Adalat's order for arbitrator appointment was deemed invalid due to the lack of a compromise or settlement. No costs were awarded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 09 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313661