https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313657 The HC of Karnataka upheld the Reference Court's decision, dismissing the petitioners' applications under sections 28A(1) and 28A(3) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, due to non-compliance with statutory criteria. The applications were deemed not maintainable as they lacked the necessary awards under sections 28A(2) and Part III of the Act. Consequently, the revision petition was dismissed, affirming the Reference Court's adherence to legal requirements. en-us Tue, 26 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 27 Apr 2024 11:33:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313657 The HC of Karnataka upheld the Reference Court's decision, dismissing the petitioners' applications under sections 28A(1) and 28A(3) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, due to non-compliance with statutory criteria. The applications were deemed not maintainable as they lacked the necessary awards under sections 28A(2) and Part III of the Act. Consequently, the revision petition was dismissed, affirming the Reference Court's adherence to legal requirements. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 26 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313657