<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (12) TMI 36 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36578</link>
    <description>The High Court clarified the legal requirements for imposing a penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing that the focus should be on whether there was concealment or furnishing of inaccurate income particulars, rather than offsetting discrepancies between different income sources. The court directed a fresh disposal of the case by the Appellate Tribunal, criticizing the Tribunal&#039;s approach for not aligning with the legal principles of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:25:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75124" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (12) TMI 36 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36578</link>
      <description>The High Court clarified the legal requirements for imposing a penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing that the focus should be on whether there was concealment or furnishing of inaccurate income particulars, rather than offsetting discrepancies between different income sources. The court directed a fresh disposal of the case by the Appellate Tribunal, criticizing the Tribunal&#039;s approach for not aligning with the legal principles of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36578</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>