<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 1059 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751878</link>
    <description>SC allowed writ petition challenging penalty for expired e-way bill. Court found no deliberate tax evasion intent and determined technical breach insufficient for penalty imposition. Directed respondents to refund tax and penalty within four weeks, effectively quashing original penalty orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 10:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751223" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 1059 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751878</link>
      <description>SC allowed writ petition challenging penalty for expired e-way bill. Court found no deliberate tax evasion intent and determined technical breach insufficient for penalty imposition. Directed respondents to refund tax and penalty within four weeks, effectively quashing original penalty orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751878</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>