<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 1044 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751863</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, directing the adjudicating authority to release the seized goods unconditionally. The decision emphasized the failure to comply with Section 110(2) of the Customs Act, 1962, which necessitates issuing a show cause notice within six months of seizure. The appeal was disposed of, underscoring the critical importance of adhering to statutory timelines in customs procedures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2024 07:32:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751199" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 1044 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751863</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, directing the adjudicating authority to release the seized goods unconditionally. The decision emphasized the failure to comply with Section 110(2) of the Customs Act, 1962, which necessitates issuing a show cause notice within six months of seizure. The appeal was disposed of, underscoring the critical importance of adhering to statutory timelines in customs procedures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751863</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>