<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (7) TMI 88 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36570</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the expenses incurred on refreshments, lunch, liquor, etc., served at business meetings did not constitute entertainment expenditure under section 37(2A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court concluded that these expenses were necessary for holding business meetings and constituted administrative or business expenditure, rather than entertainment expenditure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:08:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (7) TMI 88 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36570</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the expenses incurred on refreshments, lunch, liquor, etc., served at business meetings did not constitute entertainment expenditure under section 37(2A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court concluded that these expenses were necessary for holding business meetings and constituted administrative or business expenditure, rather than entertainment expenditure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36570</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>