<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 1032 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751851</link>
    <description>HC allowed petitioner to file a statutory appeal challenging 100% penalty despite delay, after full discharge of tax and interest liability. The court directed appellate authority to accept appeal within two weeks without limitation bar, effectively providing relief from procedural constraints while maintaining tax compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 11:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751153" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 1032 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751851</link>
      <description>HC allowed petitioner to file a statutory appeal challenging 100% penalty despite delay, after full discharge of tax and interest liability. The court directed appellate authority to accept appeal within two weeks without limitation bar, effectively providing relief from procedural constraints while maintaining tax compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751851</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>