<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 1030 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751849</link>
    <description>HC ruled in favor of petitioners challenging GST registration cancellation. The court recognized the right to livelihood under Article 21 and granted petitioners ten days to file appeals against cancellation orders. By setting aside technical limitations, the HC provided an opportunity for dealers to challenge administrative actions that potentially violated their fundamental rights to continue business operations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 11:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751151" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 1030 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751849</link>
      <description>HC ruled in favor of petitioners challenging GST registration cancellation. The court recognized the right to livelihood under Article 21 and granted petitioners ten days to file appeals against cancellation orders. By setting aside technical limitations, the HC provided an opportunity for dealers to challenge administrative actions that potentially violated their fundamental rights to continue business operations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751849</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>