<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 1008 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751827</link>
    <description>The CESTAT NEW DELHI held that goods cleared under exemption notification are exempted goods regardless of CENVAT credit availability, and credit reversal under rule 6(3A) must be calculated accordingly. The appellant cannot retrospectively revise self-assessment after choosing exemption benefits, as assessments are appealable only before Commissioner (Appeals). Revenue neutrality cannot justify extended limitation period invocation without proving intention to evade. Since the entire demand period exceeded normal limitation and department failed to establish grounds for extended period, the demand was time-barred. Appeal allowed, impugned order set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2024 20:52:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751129" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 1008 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751827</link>
      <description>The CESTAT NEW DELHI held that goods cleared under exemption notification are exempted goods regardless of CENVAT credit availability, and credit reversal under rule 6(3A) must be calculated accordingly. The appellant cannot retrospectively revise self-assessment after choosing exemption benefits, as assessments are appealable only before Commissioner (Appeals). Revenue neutrality cannot justify extended limitation period invocation without proving intention to evade. Since the entire demand period exceeded normal limitation and department failed to establish grounds for extended period, the demand was time-barred. Appeal allowed, impugned order set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751827</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>