https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313645 Over-valuation of imported goods for setting up power projects: authorities below found invoices were routed through intermediary entities to inflate prices, and rejected the appellant's challenges to those factual findings; CESTAT and the adjudicating authority's determinations on invoice routing and valuation were treated as concurrent findings of fact and formed the basis for upholding prior orders. Consequently, the Supreme Court declined to interfere with the impugned orders and dismissed the appeal. en-us Mon, 27 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Jan 2026 14:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313645 Over-valuation of imported goods for setting up power projects: authorities below found invoices were routed through intermediary entities to inflate prices, and rejected the appellant's challenges to those factual findings; CESTAT and the adjudicating authority's determinations on invoice routing and valuation were treated as concurrent findings of fact and formed the basis for upholding prior orders. Consequently, the Supreme Court declined to interfere with the impugned orders and dismissed the appeal. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 27 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313645