<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (10) TMI 34 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36564</link>
    <description>The Tribunal accepted the explanation for delay in filing the return and treated the negligence of the person handling the return as reasonable cause, so no penalty was imposable. On that factual foundation, the High Court held that no question of law arose from the Tribunal&#039;s order for reference under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and rejected the reference application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:57:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75110" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (10) TMI 34 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36564</link>
      <description>The Tribunal accepted the explanation for delay in filing the return and treated the negligence of the person handling the return as reasonable cause, so no penalty was imposable. On that factual foundation, the High Court held that no question of law arose from the Tribunal&#039;s order for reference under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and rejected the reference application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36564</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>