https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313628 The appellate court dismissed the plaintiff's second appeal for specific performance of an agreement to sell 1/3rd share of the suit property. The court upheld the lower appellate court's decree, which granted specific performance for the respondent's share only, as the respondent lacked authority to sell the 2/3rd share belonging to his sisters. The trial court initially dismissed the suit, and the appellate court found no substantial question of law, affirming that the respondent could not alienate property not exclusively in his name in the revenue records. en-us Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 Apr 2024 12:40:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313628 The appellate court dismissed the plaintiff's second appeal for specific performance of an agreement to sell 1/3rd share of the suit property. The court upheld the lower appellate court's decree, which granted specific performance for the respondent's share only, as the respondent lacked authority to sell the 2/3rd share belonging to his sisters. The trial court initially dismissed the suit, and the appellate court found no substantial question of law, affirming that the respondent could not alienate property not exclusively in his name in the revenue records. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313628