https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=12556 The petition contended that Sections 2, 9, 12 and 18 of the 101st Amendment and the GST Council's role violated the basic structure by abdicating Parliament's legislative function; the High Court dismissed the petition for lack of locus, holding the petitioner lacked standing and that transitioned VAT dealers were not a marginalized class unable to litigate their rights. en-us Thu, 25 Apr 2024 10:16:08 +0530 Thu, 25 Apr 2024 10:16:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=12556 The petition contended that Sections 2, 9, 12 and 18 of the 101st Amendment and the GST Council's role violated the basic structure by abdicating Parliament's legislative function; the High Court dismissed the petition for lack of locus, holding the petitioner lacked standing and that transitioned VAT dealers were not a marginalized class unable to litigate their rights. Articles Goods and Services Tax - GST Thu, 25 Apr 2024 10:16:08 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=12556