<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Supreme Court Converts Imprisonment to Fine for Misbranding Sugar Confectionery, Citing Age and Time Since Offense.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76868</link>
    <description>Food Safety and Standards - Selling sugar boiled confectionery with inadequate labeling - Misbranding - The courts upheld the conviction based on evidence that the appellants&#039; products were misbranded, as they did not comply with labeling requirements specified under Rule 32 of the Act. - The Supreme Court modified the sentence for one of the appellants, considering factors such as age and the passage of time since the offense. The imprisonment term was converted to a fine, aligning with precedents where reduced punishments were applied retrospectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2024 06:56:24 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2024 06:56:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751054" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court Converts Imprisonment to Fine for Misbranding Sugar Confectionery, Citing Age and Time Since Offense.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76868</link>
      <description>Food Safety and Standards - Selling sugar boiled confectionery with inadequate labeling - Misbranding - The courts upheld the conviction based on evidence that the appellants&#039; products were misbranded, as they did not comply with labeling requirements specified under Rule 32 of the Act. - The Supreme Court modified the sentence for one of the appellants, considering factors such as age and the passage of time since the offense. The imprisonment term was converted to a fine, aligning with precedents where reduced punishments were applied retrospectively.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2024 06:56:24 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76868</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>