<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 1004 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751823</link>
    <description>HC allowed the petition challenging administrative notices due to procedural irregularities. The court found significant violations of natural justice principles, including contradictory hearing dates and lack of proper communication. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remitted for re-adjudication, ensuring the petitioner receives fair opportunity for hearing and representation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 18:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751051" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 1004 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751823</link>
      <description>HC allowed the petition challenging administrative notices due to procedural irregularities. The court found significant violations of natural justice principles, including contradictory hearing dates and lack of proper communication. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remitted for re-adjudication, ensuring the petitioner receives fair opportunity for hearing and representation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751823</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>