<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 998 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751817</link>
    <description>HC ruled that refund applications were timely based on CBIC circular clarifying &quot;Relevant Date&quot; for tax refund calculations. Despite initial rejections by Appellate Authority for alleged delay, the court found applications within prescribed limitation period. The order set aside the previous dismissal and directed reconsideration of the refund claim on substantive merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 10:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751045" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 998 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751817</link>
      <description>HC ruled that refund applications were timely based on CBIC circular clarifying &quot;Relevant Date&quot; for tax refund calculations. Despite initial rejections by Appellate Authority for alleged delay, the court found applications within prescribed limitation period. The order set aside the previous dismissal and directed reconsideration of the refund claim on substantive merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751817</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>