<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 989 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751808</link>
    <description>Unexplained cash credit under section 68 was assessed on whether investor companies had the creditworthiness and whether the share subscriptions were genuine. The tax authority and appellate officer applied a preponderance of probabilities, finding investors were group-related, funds were routed through one principal company and passed through investing entities to the assessee on the same days, and banking proofs and incorporation certificates were insufficient to establish independent capacity. Consequently the transactions were held not genuine due to roundtripping of funds and the revenue&#039;s additions were sustained on the facts and surrounding circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 17:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751036" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 989 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751808</link>
      <description>Unexplained cash credit under section 68 was assessed on whether investor companies had the creditworthiness and whether the share subscriptions were genuine. The tax authority and appellate officer applied a preponderance of probabilities, finding investors were group-related, funds were routed through one principal company and passed through investing entities to the assessee on the same days, and banking proofs and incorporation certificates were insufficient to establish independent capacity. Consequently the transactions were held not genuine due to roundtripping of funds and the revenue&#039;s additions were sustained on the facts and surrounding circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751808</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>