<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 985 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751804</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi held that offshore supplies of plant and equipment cannot be treated as standalone activities when part of an integrated project contract. The tribunal found that a contract for designing, supplying, erecting, and commissioning a complete paper mill constitutes a composite indivisible contract, making offshore supply receipts taxable in India. However, the tribunal criticized the AO&#039;s adhoc attribution of 25% profits to the PE and the 5% profit rate estimation by Commissioner (Appeals) as lacking proper analysis. The case was remanded to AO for fresh adjudication after examining individual contract terms for different projects and properly analyzing the PE&#039;s role in offshore activities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2024 06:35:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 985 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751804</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi held that offshore supplies of plant and equipment cannot be treated as standalone activities when part of an integrated project contract. The tribunal found that a contract for designing, supplying, erecting, and commissioning a complete paper mill constitutes a composite indivisible contract, making offshore supply receipts taxable in India. However, the tribunal criticized the AO&#039;s adhoc attribution of 25% profits to the PE and the 5% profit rate estimation by Commissioner (Appeals) as lacking proper analysis. The case was remanded to AO for fresh adjudication after examining individual contract terms for different projects and properly analyzing the PE&#039;s role in offshore activities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751804</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>