<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 970 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751789</link>
    <description>Revised BOQ approval, completion certificate and invoices supported the operational debt claim, and the absence of internal committee approval was treated as an internal administrative issue that could not defeat entitlement where the respondent had accepted the work. A later MSME reference and arbitral award did not create a pre-existing dispute for Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code purposes because the section 8 notice and section 9 application had already been filed. A defect in the original section 9 application regarding the default date and amount was cured by amendment, and rejection as incomplete was impermissible because no statutory opportunity to rectify defects had been given.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2024 07:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751017" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 970 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751789</link>
      <description>Revised BOQ approval, completion certificate and invoices supported the operational debt claim, and the absence of internal committee approval was treated as an internal administrative issue that could not defeat entitlement where the respondent had accepted the work. A later MSME reference and arbitral award did not create a pre-existing dispute for Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code purposes because the section 8 notice and section 9 application had already been filed. A defect in the original section 9 application regarding the default date and amount was cured by amendment, and rejection as incomplete was impermissible because no statutory opportunity to rectify defects had been given.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751789</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>