<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 1511 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313625</link>
    <description>In extradition matters, the judiciary sentences according to law, but the Executive remains bound by its sovereign assurance to the requesting State and must take steps to secure commutation or remission so the sentence does not extend beyond the assured 25-year period, with action required within one month after completion of that term. Section 428 of the Code of Criminal Procedure applies only to detention undergone in connection with the Indian case for which the accused is ultimately convicted and sentenced. Custody in Portugal for a separate local offence was not available as set-off, and the detention for the Indian proceedings was reckoned from 12.10.2005.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2024 06:30:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750996" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 1511 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313625</link>
      <description>In extradition matters, the judiciary sentences according to law, but the Executive remains bound by its sovereign assurance to the requesting State and must take steps to secure commutation or remission so the sentence does not extend beyond the assured 25-year period, with action required within one month after completion of that term. Section 428 of the Code of Criminal Procedure applies only to detention undergone in connection with the Indian case for which the accused is ultimately convicted and sentenced. Custody in Portugal for a separate local offence was not available as set-off, and the detention for the Indian proceedings was reckoned from 12.10.2005.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313625</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>