<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 697 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313611</link>
    <description>The HC set aside the trial court&#039;s order and allowed the revision petition, permitting the applicants to be impleaded in the civil suit under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. The court determined that the applicants, claiming ownership and possession of the disputed property, were necessary parties for proper adjudication, as the plaintiff sought a mandatory injunction against the Improvement Trust concerning property allegedly owned by the applicants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2024 19:04:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750982" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 697 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313611</link>
      <description>The HC set aside the trial court&#039;s order and allowed the revision petition, permitting the applicants to be impleaded in the civil suit under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. The court determined that the applicants, claiming ownership and possession of the disputed property, were necessary parties for proper adjudication, as the plaintiff sought a mandatory injunction against the Improvement Trust concerning property allegedly owned by the applicants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313611</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>