https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751766 HC ruled in favor of petitioner, setting aside retrospective GST registration cancellation due to procedural irregularities. The court restored registration, directing petitioner to file pending returns and allowing tax authorities potential future recovery actions. The judgment emphasized proper notice and hearing requirements under Section 29(2) of CGST Act, 2017, rejecting mechanical cancellation without substantive grounds. en-us Wed, 10 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Apr 2025 11:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751766 HC ruled in favor of petitioner, setting aside retrospective GST registration cancellation due to procedural irregularities. The court restored registration, directing petitioner to file pending returns and allowing tax authorities potential future recovery actions. The judgment emphasized proper notice and hearing requirements under Section 29(2) of CGST Act, 2017, rejecting mechanical cancellation without substantive grounds. Case-Laws GST Wed, 10 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751766