<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (5) TMI 23 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36546</link>
    <description>The court determined that rule 19A(3) was ultra vires section 80J of the Income Tax Act. It held that borrowed capital should be included in the computation of capital employed for the purpose of section 80J to encourage industrial development. The court found that the rule exceeded the rule-making authority granted under section 80J and directed the deductions to be allowed as per its observations, quashing the Commissioner&#039;s orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:05:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75092" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (5) TMI 23 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36546</link>
      <description>The court determined that rule 19A(3) was ultra vires section 80J of the Income Tax Act. It held that borrowed capital should be included in the computation of capital employed for the purpose of section 80J to encourage industrial development. The court found that the rule exceeded the rule-making authority granted under section 80J and directed the deductions to be allowed as per its observations, quashing the Commissioner&#039;s orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36546</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>