<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Annuls Demand, Validates Composition Scheme Use Without Written Notice, Following Mehta Plast Precedent.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76840</link>
    <description>Works Contract Service - availment of Composition Scheme - The Tribunal set aside this demand, recognizing the appellant’s exercise of the composition scheme as valid, even if not explicitly communicated in writing, following the precedent of Mehta Plast Corporation v Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur. The payment under the scheme itself was considered an implicit exercise of the option.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2024 06:28:43 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2024 06:28:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750895" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Annuls Demand, Validates Composition Scheme Use Without Written Notice, Following Mehta Plast Precedent.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76840</link>
      <description>Works Contract Service - availment of Composition Scheme - The Tribunal set aside this demand, recognizing the appellant’s exercise of the composition scheme as valid, even if not explicitly communicated in writing, following the precedent of Mehta Plast Corporation v Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur. The payment under the scheme itself was considered an implicit exercise of the option.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2024 06:28:43 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76840</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>