<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 907 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751726</link>
    <description>CESTAT Allahabad remanded the case to the original authority for reconsideration of service tax demand. The appellant disputed quantification of taxable services, claiming deduction of Rs. 84,17,327.67 for Supply of Tangible Goods services provided before becoming taxable on 16.05.2008. The appellant submitted chartered accountant-certified charts showing invoices for truck, tractor, and dumper hiring charges. Since neither the adjudicating authority nor first appellate authority made specific findings on this substantial deduction claim, the matter was remanded for fresh consideration. Appeal was partly allowed for remand purposes only.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2024 06:28:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750891" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 907 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751726</link>
      <description>CESTAT Allahabad remanded the case to the original authority for reconsideration of service tax demand. The appellant disputed quantification of taxable services, claiming deduction of Rs. 84,17,327.67 for Supply of Tangible Goods services provided before becoming taxable on 16.05.2008. The appellant submitted chartered accountant-certified charts showing invoices for truck, tractor, and dumper hiring charges. Since neither the adjudicating authority nor first appellate authority made specific findings on this substantial deduction claim, the matter was remanded for fresh consideration. Appeal was partly allowed for remand purposes only.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751726</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>