https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751716 The SC held that promotional trailers are unilateral invitations to treat, not contractual offers, and cannot create binding obligations regarding movie content. The Court distinguished between the trailer (mere advertisement) and the actual service transaction (ticket purchase for movie viewing). Since trailers don't constitute offers or promises, their content variations from the final movie don't amount to service deficiency or unfair trade practice. The Court emphasized that artistic services inherently involve creative discretion and substantial variations. The consumer protection complaint regarding missing trailer content in the movie was dismissed, with the SC setting aside findings of service deficiency and unfair trade practice. en-us Mon, 22 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Apr 2024 03:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751716 The SC held that promotional trailers are unilateral invitations to treat, not contractual offers, and cannot create binding obligations regarding movie content. The Court distinguished between the trailer (mere advertisement) and the actual service transaction (ticket purchase for movie viewing). Since trailers don't constitute offers or promises, their content variations from the final movie don't amount to service deficiency or unfair trade practice. The Court emphasized that artistic services inherently involve creative discretion and substantial variations. The consumer protection complaint regarding missing trailer content in the movie was dismissed, with the SC setting aside findings of service deficiency and unfair trade practice. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 22 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751716