<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 894 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751713</link>
    <description>HC invalidated an unsigned tax order under CGST Act, 2017, following precedent that an unsigned order lacks legal enforceability. Despite tax authorities&#039; argument about digital upload, the court ruled the order fundamentally defective. The HC directed authorities to issue a properly signed replacement order, effectively setting aside the original unsigned document.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 14:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750869" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 894 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751713</link>
      <description>HC invalidated an unsigned tax order under CGST Act, 2017, following precedent that an unsigned order lacks legal enforceability. Despite tax authorities&#039; argument about digital upload, the court ruled the order fundamentally defective. The HC directed authorities to issue a properly signed replacement order, effectively setting aside the original unsigned document.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751713</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>