https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313604 The HC disposed of the writ petition challenging assessment orders against a partnership firm for AY 2002-03. The petitioner, a former partner, claimed non-liability for the KGST amount post-retirement. The HC directed the petitioner to pursue an appeal under the KGST Act within 30 days. An interim order was granted, maintaining its effect for 30 days, and the appellate authority was instructed to expedite the appeal process within two months. If the appeal was not filed, recovery proceedings could commence. The appellate authority was tasked with an independent assessment of the case's merits. en-us Mon, 21 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Apr 2024 19:43:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313604 The HC disposed of the writ petition challenging assessment orders against a partnership firm for AY 2002-03. The petitioner, a former partner, claimed non-liability for the KGST amount post-retirement. The HC directed the petitioner to pursue an appeal under the KGST Act within 30 days. An interim order was granted, maintaining its effect for 30 days, and the appellate authority was instructed to expedite the appeal process within two months. If the appeal was not filed, recovery proceedings could commence. The appellate authority was tasked with an independent assessment of the case's merits. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 21 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313604