<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 775 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313595</link>
    <description>The writ petition in a customs matter was withdrawn after the petitioners, relying on statements in the respondents&#039; affidavit, sought liberty to make a fresh representation to the concerned respondent for redressal of grievances. The respondents raised no objection, and the court permitted withdrawal with the requested liberty. The order is procedural and does not decide the merits of the underlying customs dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2024 18:30:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 775 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313595</link>
      <description>The writ petition in a customs matter was withdrawn after the petitioners, relying on statements in the respondents&#039; affidavit, sought liberty to make a fresh representation to the concerned respondent for redressal of grievances. The respondents raised no objection, and the court permitted withdrawal with the requested liberty. The order is procedural and does not decide the merits of the underlying customs dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313595</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>